The clarification of the US Congress/NIH Recommendation -- by Rick
Johnson, director of SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources
Coalition) (quoted below) -- is exactly correct.
Once the mists of misunderstanding are cleared, the US Congress/NIH
recommendation to mandate that all NIH-fundees must provide toll-free
public access online ("Open Access" OA) to all articles resulting from
NIH-funded research -- by self-archiving all articles online -- will be
seen as one of most obvious and natural conditions that tax-payers can
and should attach to eligibility for receiving research funding from
public money in the online age.
The mandate is in no way an attempt to impose the OA publishing model
on publishers. It is merely the natural requirement that publicly-funded
research results must be made publicly accessible. Ninety-two percent
of journals have already given their official green light to author
self-archiving.
http://romeo.eprints.org/stats.php
The self-archiving mandate will simply see to it that authors
actually do so, to their own benefit, to the benefit of research progress,
and to the benefit of the tax-payers who funded the research.
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html
http://citebase.eprints.org/isi_study/
Stevan Harnad
Publishers Protest at NIH:
Say free access initiative would hurt scholarly societies
Andrew Albanese
Library Journal: News 9/1/200
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA447063
"While supporters of open access hailed a proposal by the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) to make all taxpayer-funded NIH
research freely available within six months (see News, LJ 8/04,
p. 17),
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA443930
representatives of more than 50 publishers visited the NIH
offices in early August to voice strong opposition. "This measure
caught publishers completely off-guard," said Barbara Meredith,
VP of professional and scholarly publishing at the Association of
American Publishers (AAP). "This essentially mandates open access
without any evidentiary hearings or studies."
"Rick Johnson, director of SPARC (Scholarly Publishing and Academic
Resources Coalition), in a letter to NIH director Elias Zerhouni,
suggested that NIH had made the right choice and that publishers
appeared to "misunderstand the plan, which proposes open archiving,
not open-access publication." Open archiving, Johnson said, "is not
a threat to journals," as articles in PubMed Central are not the
final, authoritative version of the article preferred by authors for
citation purposes and that the proportion of open access articles
in a typical journal likely would be insufficient for libraries or
individuals to cancel their subscriptions."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sparc director Rick Johnson's letter to NIH director Elias Zerhouni:
http://www.arl.org/sparc/taxpayer/SPARC_letter_NIH_OA.pdf
Pertinent Prior AmSci Topic Threads:
"AAU misinterprets House Appropriations Committee Recommendation"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3892.html
"What Provosts Need to Mandate"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3240.html
"Implementing the US/UK recommendation to mandate OA Self-Archiving"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3891.html
"Mandating OA around the corner?"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3829.html
"University policy mandating self-archiving of research output"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3438.html
"The UK report, press coverage, and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3871.html
"UK Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific Publication"
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3407.html
UNIVERSITIES: If you have adopted or plan to adopt an institutional
policy of providing Open Access to your own research article output,
please describe your policy at:
http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
UNIFIED DUAL OPEN-ACCESS-PROVISION POLICY:
BOAI-2 ("gold"): Publish your article in a suitable open-access
journal whenever one exists.
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#journals
BOAI-1 ("green"): Otherwise, publish your article in a suitable
toll-access journal and also self-archive it.
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/
http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
AMERICAN SCIENTIST OPEN ACCESS FORUM:
A complete Hypermail archive of the ongoing discussion of providing
open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online (1998-2004)
is available at:
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html
To join the Forum:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html
Post discussion to:
american-scientist-open-access-forum_at_amsci.org
Received on Wed Sep 01 2004 - 16:36:48 BST