Presumably it's the 47% who did, at least occasionally, use self-archived
copies who would have answered this question. Their answers suggest that
some of them were confused about what was and wasn't a collection of s/a
articles
I suggest you read the article
Sally
Sally Morris
South House, The Street
Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Tel: +44(0)1903 871286
Email: sally_at_morris-assocs.demon.co.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM_at_LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG] On
Behalf Of Heather Morrison
Sent: 18 January 2010 01:07
To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM_at_LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG
Subject: Re: Roundtable Press Release (Access to Research Results)
On 17-Jan-10, at 2:39 PM, Sally Morris wrote:
> Those who look beyond the abstract will find that we did, indeed,
> ask where
> they looked for articles
>
> Sally
If more than half are not aware of author self-archiving (assuming
your abstract is correct on this point), why would they look for self-
archived copies?
Heather Morrison, MLIS
The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
Received on Mon Jan 18 2010 - 17:21:40 GMT