Ok, I understand why you put it the way you did and I accept it. However,
what you write in the second, "Still Kovacs" comment is not quite clear to
me. I think he wrote in detail about the abduction problem
w.r.t. connectionism to refute this latter approach, not to discuss the
problem itself in more detail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 13 2001 - 18:38:04 BST