Can I ask you about a couple of the Schyns commentaries this time?
First the commentry by Latimer, C. R. Could you please explain the
>Whether or not the property of symmetry is captured or derivable
>from a pixel-based decomposition depends entirely on how the
>decomposition and its attributes are defined. For some
>decompositions and their attributes (Gibson's 1969 graphemic
>analysis which does not specify locations of parts within
>characters) symmetry will not be derivable directly from the parts.
>For other decompositions and their attributes, (Latimer, Joung &
>Stevens, 1994; Sejnowski, Kinker & Hinton, 1986) symmetry will be
At the end of his commentary he writes,
>the flexibility proposed by the authors may lie in the ability of
>the brain to adopt efficient and context-sensitive decompositions
>rather than attempting to create or derive features from a fixed
What does he mean by "efficient and context-sensitive
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 16:23:20 GMT